Dsip.
F💡 Explain this simply
Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.
It draws interest for cognitive neuropeptides.
F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.
General anti-aging / longevity; Human injury recovery; Muscle growth or fat loss claims.
Early and speculative; worth watching, not relying on.
Before you decide, compare Dsip with Semax, N Acetyl Semax Amidate, Selank. See all →
Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.
Its biological effect is described in the mechanism section.
It draws interest for cognitive neuropeptides.
F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.
Delta sleep-inducing peptide, a nonapeptide proposed to promote slow-wave sleep. Across the literature, human sleep results have been inconsistent; it never reached established clinical use and its physiological role remains unresolved.
Verified citations resolve to PubMed / FDA. See how we score.
Dsip: the research file
What it is
DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide) is a small endogenous nonapeptide with the amino acid sequence Trp-Ala-Gly-Gly-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu (WAGGDASGE), molecular weight roughly 850 Da. It was first isolated in 1974 by Schoenenberger, Monnier and colleagues in Switzerland from the cerebral venous blood of rabbits placed in an electrically induced state of slow-wave (delta) sleep, and named for that apparent sleep-promoting property. DSIP-like immunoreactive material has since been detected in various mammalian tissues and human fluids (including breast milk), but it remains a biochemical "riddle": no gene, precursor protein, or specific receptor for it has been definitively identified.
How it works
DSIP has no single confirmed receptor or signaling pathway; its mechanism remains genuinely unresolved despite decades of study. Reported preclinical interactions are diffuse and concentration-dependent, including modulation of NMDA-receptor activity, effects on glucocorticoid/stress-axis regulation, and engagement of MAPK signaling cascades, along with proposed influences on GABAergic, opioid/enkephalin, and somatostatin systems. It does not behave like a classical hypnotic acting at a defined target; instead it has been framed as a neuromodulator or "homeostatic" regulator with dose- and timing-dependent, sometimes bidirectional, effects on arousal. Its very short circulating half-life (on the order of minutes) further complicates any straightforward receptor-occupancy mechanism.
What the evidence shows
Human data exist but are old, small, and mixed. Small studies from the early 1980s (e.g., Schneider-Helmert and colleagues, Experientia 1981; Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1981) reported acute and delayed improvements in sleep efficiency, latency and continuity in insomniac and normal subjects after intravenous DSIP, with good tolerability. However, a later double-blind matched-pairs study in 16 chronic insomniacs (Neuropsychobiology, 1992) found higher sleep efficiency and shorter latency yet concluded short-term DSIP is "not likely to be of major therapeutic benefit." A 1984 clinical trial (European Neurology) and a pilot study in chronic pain also reported effects, and a 2009 anaesthesia study (European Journal of Anaesthesiology) found DSIP altered bispectral index/EEG as an isoflurane adjunct. A 2006 Journal of Neurochemistry review explicitly calls DSIP "a still unresolved riddle," underscoring that no modern, adequately powered, registration-quality trial has confirmed a clinical sleep benefit.
Safety considerations
In the small historical human studies DSIP was generally described as well tolerated with few reported acute side effects, including reports of no daytime sedation hangover. However, these trials were tiny, short-term, and decades old, so the safety database is thin and there is essentially no modern controlled long-term safety, immunogenicity, or chronic-exposure data. Material sold for "research" is unregulated, of unverified purity and identity, and not produced to pharmaceutical standards, which introduces contamination and mislabeling risks independent of the peptide itself. Long-term effects, drug interactions, and effects in any specific population remain unknown.
Regulatory status
DSIP is not approved by the FDA (or, to public knowledge, any major regulator) as a drug for sleep or any other indication; it has only ever been an investigational/experimental compound and is currently sold as a research-use-only chemical. It is not a WADA-prohibited substance by name, but it is not a legitimate, quality-controlled medicine.
- Nonapeptide, sequence Trp-Ala-Gly-Gly-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu (WAGGDASGE), ~850 Da
- First isolated 1974 from cerebral venous blood of sleep-induced rabbits (Schoenenberger/Monnier, Switzerland)
- No gene, precursor, or specific receptor has been definitively identified for DSIP
- Very short reported half-life (on the order of minutes)
- Best human evidence is small early-1980s sleep studies with mixed/conflicting results
- A 2006 review labels it a 'still unresolved riddle'; not an approved drug
- [1]Delta-sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP): a review — Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1984, PMID 6145137
- [2]Delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP): a still unresolved riddle — Journal of Neurochemistry, 2006, PMID 16539679
- [3]Effects of delta sleep-inducing peptide on sleep of chronic insomniac patients. A double-blind study — Neuropsychobiology, 1992, PMID 1299794
- [4]Delta sleep-inducing peptide alters bispectral index, the EEG and heart rate variability as an adjunct to isoflurane anaesthesia — European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2009, PMID 19142086
Currently sits at Anecdote — Mostly online reports — no real study base yet.
Areas this compound is studied or discussed for — not guaranteed effects.
- DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide) is an endogenous neuropeptide named for its association with delta-wave sleep.
- It is studied for sleep and stress modulation, but the evidence is old and inconsistent.
- Not FDA-approved; research-only.
- It is not an established sleep treatment.
Marketing claim vs what the data actually shows. Tap a row for detail.
Claim audit for Dsip is in progress — common claims will be checked against sources here. Meanwhile, the real source corpus is in References.
Stack fit
Decision clarity: UnknownNot enough indexed evidence to assess.
Stack verdict: Early and speculative; worth watching, not relying on.
Dsip is not established for:
Tier ranking
A weighted evidence score of 22/100 places dsip in F tier — based on published evidence, not popularity.
Weighted evidence score 22/100
Why not D: held back by human evidence, preclinical depth, mechanism confidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance.
What would move it up: Larger controlled human trials, clearer long-term safety, replicated findings, and regulatory progress.
What would move it down: Failed confirmatory trials, new safety signals, or evidence that popular claims don't translate.
- Dsip is not FDA-approved for human use; it is discussed in a research context.
- It belongs to the Cognitive neuropeptides class.
- Whether observed effects reliably translate to humans at large.
- Long-term safety in healthy users, and full drug-interaction risk.
- Optimal studied parameters outside any approved indication.
- Claim-by-claim verdicts — these are authored against verified sources and shown when complete.
- Quality and purity of material from non-pharmaceutical sources.
This is not medical advice. These are areas where professional guidance and better evidence matter most.
See it next to its closest alternatives.
Full brief
A deeper, chapter-by-chapter research briefing. Tap any chapter to expand.
- What it is
- The early-evidence lane
- Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower
- Proven lane vs speculative lane
- What people report
- Regulatory status
- What changed recently
01What it is
Simple takeaway: Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.
Peptides studied for effects on cognition, mood, and the nervous system. It is not approved for human use; it is discussed here in a research context only.
03The early-evidence lane
Simple takeaway: Support is early-stage; 0 registered trials and 0 sources indexed.
The most defensible evidence comes from early research. Human clinical evidence is limited.
04Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower
Simple takeaway: Composite maturity 1.3/5.
What holds it back: human evidence, preclinical depth, mechanism confidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance. What supports its placement: its overall evidence profile. Stronger human trials, clearer long-term safety data, and regulatory progress would move it up; a safety signal or failure to replicate would move it down.
05Proven lane vs speculative lane
Simple takeaway: The research interest is real; most popular claims remain speculative.
What's supported is the preclinical/mechanistic research. What's speculative is the broad human benefit frequently claimed online, which the indexed human evidence does not establish.
06What people report
Simple takeaway: Community reports are not clinical evidence.
Online reports can surface expectation patterns and possible safety signals, but they are shaped by placebo effects, selection bias, confounders, and uncertain product quality and sourcing. We don't treat anecdotes as proof and we don't publish dosing or protocols.
07Regulatory status
Simple takeaway: Research-use-only
Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts. Regulatory status can change and differs by country; several peptides are also prohibited in sport (WADA). Verify current status before relying on it.
08What changed recently
Simple takeaway: No major evidence-changing update was identified in this review window.
The current profile reflects the existing body of indexed evidence. Material changes — new trials, approvals, or safety findings — are noted here when an editor logs them.
How the community sees this vs the evidence.
Evidence tier is F. Do you agree?
Community votes reflect user perception, not scientific proof — the evidence tier comes from our Research Maturity Index. Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are collected.
Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are in — we don't show invented numbers.
Get notified when new studies, safety updates, regulatory changes, or the tier ranking change.
FAQs
Is Dsip FDA-approved?
No. Dsip is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online. Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts.
What is Dsip studied for?
Dsip is studied mainly for sleep. Peptides studied for effects on cognition, mood, and the nervous system.
What does the research say about Dsip?
Mostly animal evidence. Human data is limited; most support comes from preclinical research.
Is Dsip safe?
Long-term human safety is not well established for Dsip. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an added risk.
🧮 Reconstitution calculator (educational)
Educational reconstitution math from your own values — not medical advice or a dose recommendation. Open the full calculator →
Each unit on a 100u · 1.0 mL syringe ≈ 25 mcg of this solution.
Show the math
More water → lower concentration → more units for the same amount.
Get the vial, water, target, and 10-unit draw sent to your inbox so it's easy to reference — and follow when the evidence changes. Free, no account.
Research reference only. Not medical advice, treatment instructions, or a purchase recommendation. Consult a licensed professional.