← Tier board·File·#011·Evidence reviewed Jun 2026Tweet
01 · the file

Dsip.

F
Research-use-onlyCognitive neuropeptides
FDsipVerdict: Mostly animal evidenceHuman evidence: anecdotalStatus: Research-use-onlyReceiptsCalculatorReferences
💡 Explain this simply
What this is

Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.

Why people care

It draws interest for cognitive neuropeptides.

What's actually supported

F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.

What's not proven

General anti-aging / longevity; Human injury recovery; Muscle growth or fat loss claims.

What to be cautious about

Early and speculative; worth watching, not relying on.

What to compare next

Before you decide, compare Dsip with Semax, N Acetyl Semax Amidate, Selank. See all →

Research-onlyHuman-data limitedSafety unclearRegulatory friction high
What it is

Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.

What it does

Its biological effect is described in the mechanism section.

Why people use it

It draws interest for cognitive neuropeptides.

Does it work?

F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.

Bottom lineDsip is F-tier: scientifically early, but human evidence is minimal and the online narrative tends to run ahead of it.
What the published evidence shows

Delta sleep-inducing peptide, a nonapeptide proposed to promote slow-wave sleep. Across the literature, human sleep results have been inconsistent; it never reached established clinical use and its physiological role remains unresolved.

[1]Acute and delayed effects of DSIP on human sleep behavior (double-blind study)Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol, 1981 (PMID 6895513)

Verified citations resolve to PubMed / FDA. See how we score.

Dsip: the research file

What it is

DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide) is a small endogenous nonapeptide with the amino acid sequence Trp-Ala-Gly-Gly-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu (WAGGDASGE), molecular weight roughly 850 Da. It was first isolated in 1974 by Schoenenberger, Monnier and colleagues in Switzerland from the cerebral venous blood of rabbits placed in an electrically induced state of slow-wave (delta) sleep, and named for that apparent sleep-promoting property. DSIP-like immunoreactive material has since been detected in various mammalian tissues and human fluids (including breast milk), but it remains a biochemical "riddle": no gene, precursor protein, or specific receptor for it has been definitively identified.

How it works

DSIP has no single confirmed receptor or signaling pathway; its mechanism remains genuinely unresolved despite decades of study. Reported preclinical interactions are diffuse and concentration-dependent, including modulation of NMDA-receptor activity, effects on glucocorticoid/stress-axis regulation, and engagement of MAPK signaling cascades, along with proposed influences on GABAergic, opioid/enkephalin, and somatostatin systems. It does not behave like a classical hypnotic acting at a defined target; instead it has been framed as a neuromodulator or "homeostatic" regulator with dose- and timing-dependent, sometimes bidirectional, effects on arousal. Its very short circulating half-life (on the order of minutes) further complicates any straightforward receptor-occupancy mechanism.

What the evidence shows

Human data exist but are old, small, and mixed. Small studies from the early 1980s (e.g., Schneider-Helmert and colleagues, Experientia 1981; Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1981) reported acute and delayed improvements in sleep efficiency, latency and continuity in insomniac and normal subjects after intravenous DSIP, with good tolerability. However, a later double-blind matched-pairs study in 16 chronic insomniacs (Neuropsychobiology, 1992) found higher sleep efficiency and shorter latency yet concluded short-term DSIP is "not likely to be of major therapeutic benefit." A 1984 clinical trial (European Neurology) and a pilot study in chronic pain also reported effects, and a 2009 anaesthesia study (European Journal of Anaesthesiology) found DSIP altered bispectral index/EEG as an isoflurane adjunct. A 2006 Journal of Neurochemistry review explicitly calls DSIP "a still unresolved riddle," underscoring that no modern, adequately powered, registration-quality trial has confirmed a clinical sleep benefit.

Safety considerations

In the small historical human studies DSIP was generally described as well tolerated with few reported acute side effects, including reports of no daytime sedation hangover. However, these trials were tiny, short-term, and decades old, so the safety database is thin and there is essentially no modern controlled long-term safety, immunogenicity, or chronic-exposure data. Material sold for "research" is unregulated, of unverified purity and identity, and not produced to pharmaceutical standards, which introduces contamination and mislabeling risks independent of the peptide itself. Long-term effects, drug interactions, and effects in any specific population remain unknown.

Regulatory status

DSIP is not approved by the FDA (or, to public knowledge, any major regulator) as a drug for sleep or any other indication; it has only ever been an investigational/experimental compound and is currently sold as a research-use-only chemical. It is not a WADA-prohibited substance by name, but it is not a legitimate, quality-controlled medicine.

Key facts
  • Nonapeptide, sequence Trp-Ala-Gly-Gly-Asp-Ala-Ser-Gly-Glu (WAGGDASGE), ~850 Da
  • First isolated 1974 from cerebral venous blood of sleep-induced rabbits (Schoenenberger/Monnier, Switzerland)
  • No gene, precursor, or specific receptor has been definitively identified for DSIP
  • Very short reported half-life (on the order of minutes)
  • Best human evidence is small early-1980s sleep studies with mixed/conflicting results
  • A 2006 review labels it a 'still unresolved riddle'; not an approved drug
Sources
  1. [1]Delta-sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP): a reviewNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 1984, PMID 6145137
  2. [2]Delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP): a still unresolved riddleJournal of Neurochemistry, 2006, PMID 16539679
  3. [3]Effects of delta sleep-inducing peptide on sleep of chronic insomniac patients. A double-blind studyNeuropsychobiology, 1992, PMID 1299794
  4. [4]Delta sleep-inducing peptide alters bispectral index, the EEG and heart rate variability as an adjunct to isoflurane anaesthesiaEuropean Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2009, PMID 19142086
Evidence maturity
Anecdote
Mechanism
Animal
Early human
Clinical trials
Approved use

Currently sits at AnecdoteMostly online reports — no real study base yet.

Online hypeLowvsActual evidenceEarlyGapBalanced
02 · benefits people research this for

Areas this compound is studied or discussed for — not guaranteed effects.

Sleep
Evidence: Early / indirect
Status: Not an approved use here
Caution: Don't assume its main-use evidence transfers to this area.
Key facts
  • DSIP (Delta Sleep-Inducing Peptide) is an endogenous neuropeptide named for its association with delta-wave sleep.
  • It is studied for sleep and stress modulation, but the evidence is old and inconsistent.
Safety & status
  • Not FDA-approved; research-only.
  • It is not an established sleep treatment.
03 · evidence receipts

Marketing claim vs what the data actually shows. Tap a row for detail.

Claim audit for Dsip is in progress — common claims will be checked against sources here. Meanwhile, the real source corpus is in References.

04 · stack fit

Stack fit

Decision clarity: Unknown

Not enough indexed evidence to assess.

Best fitResearch interest in cognitive neuropeptides.
Not a good fit forAnyone expecting proven human outcomes — the human evidence isn't there yet.
Evidence confidenceLow
Risk profileUnclear
Regulatory frictionHigh
Hype riskMedium

Stack verdict: Early and speculative; worth watching, not relying on.

Not proven for

Dsip is not established for:

General anti-aging / longevityHuman injury recoveryMuscle growth or fat loss claimsDisease treatmentAny use as a proven therapy

Tier ranking

F

A weighted evidence score of 22/100 places dsip in F tier — based on published evidence, not popularity.

Weighted evidence score 22/100

Why not D: held back by human evidence, preclinical depth, mechanism confidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance.

What would move it up: Larger controlled human trials, clearer long-term safety, replicated findings, and regulatory progress.

What would move it down: Failed confirmatory trials, new safety signals, or evidence that popular claims don't translate.

Hype vs evidence (shown separately — does not affect the tier)
Internet hype: LowEvidence strength: EarlyRisk of overstatement: Medium
05 · safety / status
Evidence gap alert. Most support comes from animal, cell, or early research — high-quality human clinical evidence is limited.
Regulatory alert. This compound is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online.
Safety alert. Long-term human safety is not well established. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an additional risk.
Can it legally be used?Research-use-only
EMA / internationalVerify by region
Sport (WADA)Check the current WADA prohibited list
Known side effectsNot well characterized in humans
Biggest unknownsLong-term safety, broad off-label use, rare events
Main cautionResearch-only; human evidence limited; sourcing & purity risk
What we know
  • Dsip is not FDA-approved for human use; it is discussed in a research context.
  • It belongs to the Cognitive neuropeptides class.
What we don't know
  • Whether observed effects reliably translate to humans at large.
  • Long-term safety in healthy users, and full drug-interaction risk.
  • Optimal studied parameters outside any approved indication.
  • Claim-by-claim verdicts — these are authored against verified sources and shown when complete.
  • Quality and purity of material from non-pharmaceutical sources.
Caution if you're researching
Research-only compoundsCompetitive sports (anti-doping)Diabetes / glucose regulationPregnancy / fertility

This is not medical advice. These are areas where professional guidance and better evidence matter most.

06 · compare before you decide

See it next to its closest alternatives.

Dsip vs SemaxDsip vs N Acetyl Semax AmidateDsip vs SelankDsip vs DihexaBuild a comparison →
07 · the read

Full brief

A deeper, chapter-by-chapter research briefing. Tap any chapter to expand.

In this brief
  1. What it is
  2. The early-evidence lane
  3. Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower
  4. Proven lane vs speculative lane
  5. What people report
  6. Regulatory status
  7. What changed recently
01What it is

Simple takeaway: Dsip is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.

Peptides studied for effects on cognition, mood, and the nervous system. It is not approved for human use; it is discussed here in a research context only.

03The early-evidence lane

Simple takeaway: Support is early-stage; 0 registered trials and 0 sources indexed.

The most defensible evidence comes from early research. Human clinical evidence is limited.

What this does not prove. Preclinical or early-stage evidence does not establish reliable human outcomes.
04Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower

Simple takeaway: Composite maturity 1.3/5.

What holds it back: human evidence, preclinical depth, mechanism confidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance. What supports its placement: its overall evidence profile. Stronger human trials, clearer long-term safety data, and regulatory progress would move it up; a safety signal or failure to replicate would move it down.

05Proven lane vs speculative lane

Simple takeaway: The research interest is real; most popular claims remain speculative.

What's supported is the preclinical/mechanistic research. What's speculative is the broad human benefit frequently claimed online, which the indexed human evidence does not establish.

06What people report

Simple takeaway: Community reports are not clinical evidence.

Online reports can surface expectation patterns and possible safety signals, but they are shaped by placebo effects, selection bias, confounders, and uncertain product quality and sourcing. We don't treat anecdotes as proof and we don't publish dosing or protocols.

What this does not prove. Anecdotes cannot establish efficacy or safety.
07Regulatory status

Simple takeaway: Research-use-only

Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts. Regulatory status can change and differs by country; several peptides are also prohibited in sport (WADA). Verify current status before relying on it.

08What changed recently

Simple takeaway: No major evidence-changing update was identified in this review window.

The current profile reflects the existing body of indexed evidence. Material changes — new trials, approvals, or safety findings — are noted here when an editor logs them.

0 of 7 brief sections read
08 · community call

How the community sees this vs the evidence.

Your call on F-tier?

Evidence tier is F. Do you agree?

Community votes reflect user perception, not scientific proof — the evidence tier comes from our Research Maturity Index. Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are collected.

Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are in — we don't show invented numbers.

09 · follow updates
Follow updates on Dsip

Get notified when new studies, safety updates, regulatory changes, or the tier ranking change.

· New human study· Safety update· Regulatory change· Tier change· New claim check
10 · FAQ

FAQs

Is Dsip FDA-approved?

No. Dsip is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online. Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts.

What is Dsip studied for?

Dsip is studied mainly for sleep. Peptides studied for effects on cognition, mood, and the nervous system.

What does the research say about Dsip?

Mostly animal evidence. Human data is limited; most support comes from preclinical research.

Is Dsip safe?

Long-term human safety is not well established for Dsip. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an added risk.

🧮 Reconstitution calculator (educational)

Educational reconstitution math from your own values — not medical advice or a dose recommendation. Open the full calculator →

Medication (optional — 30+ in library)
Peptide in vial (mg)
Reconstitution water (mL)
Target amount per draw
Syringe
Draw to
10
units
Volume to draw
0.1
mL
At this amount
20
draws / vial
After one draw
4.75
mg left
Syringe · draw to 10 of 100 units
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100

Each unit on a 100u · 1.0 mL syringe ≈ 25 mcg of this solution.

Concentration
2.5
mg / mL
Concentration
2,500
mcg / mL
Per U-100 unit
25
mcg / unit
Show the math
5 mg × 1000 = 5,000 mcg in the vial
2 mL × 100 = 200 U-100 units of liquid
5,000 mcg ÷ 200 units = 25 mcg per unit
250 mcg ÷ 25 mcg/unit = 10 units
10 units ÷ 100 = 0.1 mL
5,000 mcg ÷ 250 mcg = 20 draws per vial
Compare reconstitution volumes (5mg vial)
Water
mcg / unit
units for 250mcg
1 mL505
2 mL2510
2.5 mL2012.5
3 mL16.6715
5 mL1025

More water → lower concentration → more units for the same amount.

Tweet
📩 Email yourself this setup

Get the vial, water, target, and 10-unit draw sent to your inbox so it's easy to reference — and follow when the evidence changes. Free, no account.

Keep exploring
Compare nextDsip vs SemaxSee the evidence side by side.Outcome pathSleepWhere Dsip sits vs. the alternatives.ToolConcentration calculatorHow vial size & water change concentration.
Explore related
Related compounds
SemaxDN Acetyl Semax AmidateFSelankDDihexaF
Class
Cognitive neuropeptides
Researched for
Share this fileTweet

← Back to the full database

Research reference only. Not medical advice, treatment instructions, or a purchase recommendation. Consult a licensed professional.

The all-in-one peptide app

Stop reading, start tracking.

PepCue logs your doses, runs the vial math, counts your vials, and keeps the whole protocol in one place. It replaces the spreadsheet, the calculator, and the sticky notes.

  • Dose logging
  • Reconstitution math
  • Smart reminders
  • Vial & cost tracking
iPhone · free to start
Dsip: Profile In Progress