Dihexa.

Dihexa is a research compound in the cognitive neuropeptides.

Its biological effect is described in the mechanism section.

It draws interest for cognitive neuropeptides.

F-tier evidence: no meaningful human evidence; support is preclinical or mechanistic.

What it is

Dihexa (N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6)-aminohexanoic amide; also referenced as PNB-0408) is a small, orally active peptidomimetic derived from angiotensin IV (Ang IV), a C-terminal fragment of the renin-angiotensin system. It was designed at Washington State University by chemically modifying Ang IV to increase lipophilicity and metabolic stability, yielding a brain-penetrant molecule investigated as a procognitive / antidementia research agent. It is a research chemical, not a drug; it has never been an approved medicine.

How it works

Dihexa was developed from Ang IV, whose procognitive effects were originally studied at the AT4/IRAP site, but its proposed primary mechanism is potentiation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling through its receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met, which drives dendritic spine formation (spinogenesis) and synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. Activating HGF/c-Met is thought to remodel synaptic connectivity rather than act as a classical neurotransmitter. Important caveat: the central biochemical evidence that dihexa works by binding HGF and augmenting HGF/c-Met activation came from a paper that has since been retracted for data fabrication, so the molecular mechanism should be treated as unproven. The downstream behavioral phenotype (improved spatial learning in rodents) was reported in separate, non-retracted work.

What the evidence shows

There is NO human data on dihexa — no completed clinical trials, no published human pharmacokinetics or safety. The non-retracted foundational study (McCoy et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013, PMID 23055539) reported that orally administered dihexa reversed scopolamine-induced learning deficits and improved Morris water maze performance in aged (24-month) rats, and induced spinogenesis in cultured hippocampal neurons at picomolar concentrations. Later angiotensin-IV-analog work continued in disease models (e.g., a 2024 study of an Ang IV analog in a 3-nitropropionic-acid Huntington's-like rat model, PMID 38489193). Crucially, the most-cited mechanistic paper tying dihexa's cognitive effects to HGF/c-Met (Benoist et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014, PMID 25187433) was RETRACTED in 2025 (retraction notice PMID 40312093) after a Washington State University investigation found falsified/fabricated figure data; the widely repeated "thousands of times more potent than BDNF" claim derives from this now-discredited line of work and should not be cited as established fact. The honest summary: rodent behavioral evidence exists, but the headline mechanistic and potency claims rest partly on retracted literature, and human efficacy is entirely unestablished.

Safety considerations

No human safety data exist; there is no published clinical adverse-event profile, and dihexa is sold only as a research chemical of variable purity. The principal theoretical concern follows directly from its proposed mechanism: c-Met is a validated oncology target because aberrant HGF/c-Met signaling promotes tumor proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis, so a chronic c-Met potentiator raises an unresolved oncogenic-risk question that no human study has addressed. Its reported long circulating half-life and high lipophilicity also mean tissue accumulation and off-target effects are poorly characterized. Because foundational mechanistic data were retracted for fabrication, even the basic biology underlying any risk assessment is uncertain.

Regulatory status

Dihexa is investigational/research-use-only: it is not approved by the FDA or any major regulator for any indication, has no DailyMed monograph, and has not completed human clinical trials. It is not a dietary supplement and is widely sold only as a "research chemical." It is not a WADA-listed named substance, though non-approved experimental compounds are broadly disallowed in sport.

1. [1]Evaluation of metabolically stabilized angiotensin IV analogs as procognitive/antidementia agents — J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2013, PMID 23055539 (foundational, non-retracted)
2. [2]Retraction notice: The procognitive and synaptogenic effects of angiotensin IV-derived peptides are dependent on activation of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-met system — J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 2025 (retracts the 2014 mechanistic paper PMID 25187433), PMID 40312093
3. [3]The development of small molecule angiotensin IV analogs to treat Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases — Prog Neurobiol, 2015, PMID 25455861 (review)
4. [4]PubMed search: dihexa angiotensin IV — PubMed live query for the full literature set

• Not FDA-approved; early experimental research only.
• Potent growth-factor signaling raises theoretical risks; no human safety data.

Stack fit

Why not D: held back by human evidence, preclinical depth, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance.

What would move it up: Larger controlled human trials, clearer long-term safety, replicated findings, and regulatory progress.

What would move it down: Failed confirmatory trials, new safety signals, or evidence that popular claims don't translate.

• Dihexa is not FDA-approved for human use; it is discussed in a research context.
• It belongs to the Cognitive neuropeptides class.

• Whether observed effects reliably translate to humans at large.
• Long-term safety in healthy users, and full drug-interaction risk.
• Optimal studied parameters outside any approved indication.
• Claim-by-claim verdicts — these are authored against verified sources and shown when complete.
• Quality and purity of material from non-pharmaceutical sources.

1. What it is
2. The early-evidence lane
3. Why Minimal, and not higher or lower
4. Proven lane vs speculative lane
5. What people report
6. Regulatory status
7. What changed recently