Dihexa vs Selank.

Dihexa (N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6)-aminohexanoic amide; also referenced as PNB-0408) is a small, orally active peptidomimetic derived from angiotensin IV (Ang IV), a C-terminal fragment of the renin-angiotensin system. It was designed at Washington State University by chemically modifying Ang IV to increase lipophilicity and metabolic stability, yielding a brain-penetrant molecule investigated as a procognitive / antidementia research agent. It is a research chemical, not a drug; it has never been an approved medicine.

Selank is a synthetic heptapeptide (Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg-Pro-Gly-Pro) developed at the Institute of Molecular Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, with the laboratory designation TP-7. It is a stabilized analog of tuftsin, an endogenous immunomodulatory tetrapeptide (Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg) derived from the Fc region of immunoglobulin G; the added Pro-Gly-Pro tail confers resistance to enzymatic degradation. It is studied primarily as an anxiolytic and nootropic agent and is most associated with Russian neuropharmacology research.

Dihexa was developed from Ang IV, whose procognitive effects were originally studied at the AT4/IRAP site, but its proposed primary mechanism is potentiation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) signaling through its receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met, which drives dendritic spine formation (spinogenesis) and synaptogenesis in hippocampal neurons. Activating HGF/c-Met is thought to remodel synaptic connectivity rather than act as a classical neurotransmitter. Important caveat: the central biochemical evidence that dihexa works by binding HGF and augmenting HGF/c-Met activation came from a paper that has since been retracted for data fabrication, so the molecular mechanism should be treated as unproven. The downstream behavioral phenotype (improved spatial learning in rodents) was reported in separate, non-retracted work.

Selank's parent peptide tuftsin acts on immune cells, and Selank retains immunomodulatory activity while shifting toward neuromodulation. Proposed central mechanisms include modulation of monoamine systems (serotonin, dopamine, noradrenaline) and interaction with the GABAergic and enkephalin/opioid systems; Selank has been reported to inhibit enkephalin-degrading enzymes, prolonging the action of endogenous enkephalins. It has also been reported to influence expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and to alter cytokine balance (e.g., IL-6 and interferon-related signaling). These mechanisms are largely characterized in rodent and in vitro models rather than established in humans.

There is NO human data on dihexa: no completed clinical trials, no published human pharmacokinetics or safety. The non-retracted foundational study (McCoy et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013, PMID 23055539) reported that orally administered dihexa reversed scopolamine-induced learning deficits and improved Morris water maze performance in aged (24-month) rats, and induced spinogenesis in cultured hippocampal neurons at picomolar concentrations. Later angiotensin-IV-analog work continued in disease models (e.g., a 2024 study of an Ang IV analog in a 3-nitropropionic-acid Huntington's-like rat model, PMID 38489193). Crucially, the most-cited mechanistic paper tying dihexa's cognitive effects to HGF/c-Met (Benoist et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014, PMID 25187433) was RETRACTED in 2025 (retraction notice PMID 40312093) after a Washington State University investigation found falsified/fabricated figure data; the widely repeated "thousands of times more potent than BDNF" claim derives from this now-discredited line of work and should not be cited as established fact. The honest summary: rodent behavioral evidence exists, but the headline mechanistic and potency claims rest partly on retracted literature, and human efficacy is entirely unestablished.

The great majority of Selank evidence is preclinical (rodent and in vitro), covering anxiolytic-like behavior, stress models, immune/cytokine modulation, and tissue effects under chronic stress (e.g., Bull Exp Biol Med studies on rat intestine and liver under restraint/foot-shock stress, and a cytokine study under 'social' stress). Human clinical data are limited and come almost entirely from Russian-language trials and registry approval rather than large, independently replicated, placebo-controlled studies indexed in Western literature; reported uses include generalized anxiety disorder and asthenic/neurasthenic conditions. A frequently cited molecular review (Protein and Peptide Letters, 2018, PMID 30255741) summarizes the proposed biology. Overall, robust, independently replicated human efficacy data are thin, and mechanistic plausibility should not be read as proven clinical benefit.

No human safety data exist; there is no published clinical adverse-event profile, and dihexa is sold only as a research chemical of variable purity. The principal theoretical concern follows directly from its proposed mechanism: c-Met is a validated oncology target because aberrant HGF/c-Met signaling promotes tumor proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis, so a chronic c-Met potentiator raises an unresolved oncogenic-risk question that no human study has addressed. Its reported long circulating half-life and high lipophilicity also mean tissue accumulation and off-target effects are poorly characterized. Because foundational mechanistic data were retracted for fabrication, even the basic biology underlying any risk assessment is uncertain.

Published reports, mostly from the developing Russian groups, describe Selank as generally well tolerated with a notably low sedation, dependence, and withdrawal profile compared with benzodiazepines, but rigorous long-term and large-sample safety data from independent groups are lacking. Because much of the safety record comes from the originating institutions and small studies, the true adverse-event and long-term safety profile in humans is not well established. As a peptide typically administered intranasally in research, purity, contamination, and product-quality concerns apply to non-pharmaceutical material. It has not undergone the comprehensive safety review required for major regulatory approval outside its country of origin.

Dihexa is investigational/research-use-only: it is not approved by the FDA or any major regulator for any indication, has no DailyMed monograph, and has not completed human clinical trials. It is not a dietary supplement and is widely sold only as a "research chemical." It is not a WADA-listed named substance, though non-approved experimental compounds are broadly disallowed in sport.

Selank is reported to have been registered/approved in Russia (around 2009) for anxiety and asthenic conditions, marketed as an intranasal preparation. It is not approved by the US FDA and is not an approved drug in the EU; outside Russia it is effectively investigational and is widely sold as a research-use-only / not-for-human-consumption chemical. It is not a controlled substance and is not a standard WADA-prohibited agent, but its unapproved status means quality and legality vary by jurisdiction.