← Tier board·File·#007·Evidence reviewed Jun 2026Tweet
01 · the file

CJC 1295.

F
Research-use-onlyGrowth-hormone secretagogues
FCJC 1295Verdict: Mostly animal evidenceHuman evidence: anecdotalStatus: Research-use-onlyReceiptsCalculatorReferences
💡 Explain this simply
What this is

CJC 1295 is a research compound in the growth-hormone secretagogues.

Why people care

It draws interest for growth-hormone secretagogues.

What's actually supported

F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.

What's not proven

General anti-aging / longevity; Human injury recovery; Muscle growth or fat loss claims.

What to be cautious about

Interesting on paper, but not a clinically proven option. The internet narrative is stronger than the human evidence.

What to compare next

Before you decide, compare CJC 1295 with Sermorelin, Cjc 1295 Dac, Mod Grf 1 29. See all →

Research-onlyHuman-data limitedAnimal-data heavySafety unclearRegulatory friction highMechanism-first
What it is

CJC 1295 is a research compound in the growth-hormone secretagogues.

What it does

Stimulating the pituitary's GHRH receptor to release growth hormone.

Why people use it

It draws interest for growth-hormone secretagogues.

Does it work?

F-tier evidence: human evidence is limited; most support is preclinical.

Bottom lineCJC 1295 is F-tier: scientifically interesting in preclinical models, but human evidence is minimal and the online narrative tends to run ahead of it.
What the published evidence shows

A long-acting GHRH analogue. In a real placebo-controlled trial in healthy adults (Teichman, JCEM 2006) it produced dose-dependent, sustained increases in GH (~2–10×) and IGF-1 (~1.5–3×) lasting days. Despite that verified human pharmacology, it is not FDA-approved and is used as a research chemical, with no long-term outcome data.

[1]Teichman SL et al. — Prolonged stimulation of GH and IGF-1 by CJC-1295 in healthy adultsJ Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2006 (PMID 16352683)

Verified citations resolve to PubMed / FDA. See how we score.

CJC 1295: the research file

What it is

CJC-1295 is a synthetic analog of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), based on the first 29 amino acids of human GHRH (GRF 1-29) with several amino-acid substitutions that resist enzymatic degradation. The name is used for two distinct molecules: "CJC-1295 with DAC," which carries a Drug Affinity Complex (a maleimidoproprionic acid linker) that covalently binds to circulating albumin to dramatically prolong its action; and "CJC-1295 without DAC" (often sold as "modified GRF 1-29" or "Mod GRF 1-29"), which lacks the albumin-binding linker. It was originally developed by the Canadian biotech company ConjuChem as an investigational therapeutic.

How it works

As a GHRH analog, CJC-1295 binds the GHRH receptor on somatotroph cells of the anterior pituitary, activating Gs-protein/cAMP/PKA signaling to stimulate synthesis and pulsatile release of endogenous growth hormone (GH), which in turn raises hepatic insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). The four substitutions in the GRF(1-29) backbone (notably at the position-2 alanine that is the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV cleavage site) protect the peptide from rapid breakdown, extending the half-life of the non-DAC form to roughly 30 minutes versus minutes for native GHRH. In the DAC version, the maleimide linker forms a covalent bond with cysteine-34 of serum albumin, creating a long-circulating depot; because it raises GH in a more sustained rather than sharply pulsatile manner, it is described as increasing trough and mean GH while largely preserving the body's own pulse pattern.

What the evidence shows

The principal human evidence is a single 2006 Phase 1 study in healthy adults by Teichman et al. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab, PMID 16352683), which reported that one subcutaneous dose of CJC-1295 with DAC produced dose-dependent increases in mean plasma GH of roughly 2- to 10-fold for 6 days or more and IGF-1 increases of about 1.5- to 3-fold for 9-11 days, with an estimated half-life of 5.8-8.1 days and IGF-1 staying above baseline up to 28 days after repeated dosing. ConjuChem advanced the DAC compound into a Phase 2 trial in HIV-associated visceral obesity (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00267527), but that 12-week trial was terminated in 2006. Beyond these, robust controlled human efficacy and long-term safety data are essentially absent; there are no large or long-term trials, no published outcomes for the non-DAC "modified GRF 1-29" form in humans, and much of the mechanistic rationale rests on GHRH-class pharmacology rather than direct trials of this molecule. Claims about body composition, recovery, or anti-aging benefit are not supported by published controlled human outcome data.

Safety considerations

In the short Phase 1 work, CJC-1295 with DAC was described as generally well tolerated, with the kinds of effects expected from GHRH-class agents (e.g., injection-site reactions, flushing, headache); however, this reflects small numbers and short follow-up. The Phase 2 HIV trial (NCT00267527) was terminated in 2006, and a participant death during the program drew scrutiny, though available reporting attributed that death to pre-existing coronary disease rather than establishing causation by the drug; the episode underscores how thin the safety record is. Sustained elevation of GH/IGF-1 carries class-level theoretical concerns familiar from growth-hormone pharmacology, including fluid retention, joint/muscle pain, insulin resistance and elevated blood glucose, and a theoretical concern about promoting growth of existing malignancy; long-term safety in humans is simply unknown. Much material sold as "CJC-1295" online is from unregulated sources with no purity, sterility, or identity guarantees, adding contamination and mislabeling risks.

Regulatory status

CJC-1295 (with or without DAC) has never been approved by the FDA or any major regulatory agency for any indication and remains an investigational compound that did not complete clinical development. It is not an approved medicine; it is sold only as a "research chemical," and GHRH analogs/GH secretagogues of this type are prohibited in sport by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

Key facts
  • Two different molecules share the name: 'with DAC' (albumin-binding, days-long action) and 'without DAC'/Mod GRF 1-29 (~30-minute half-life).
  • Originally developed by ConjuChem; based on GHRH (GRF 1-29) with substitutions resisting DPP-IV degradation.
  • Acts upstream by stimulating the pituitary to release the body's own GH, raising GH and IGF-1.
  • Human data are limited to early-phase work; the lead Phase 2 trial (NCT00267527) was terminated in 2006.
  • Never FDA-approved; sold only as a research chemical and banned in competitive sport by WADA.
  • Often combined in the gray market with a GH secretagogue (e.g., ipamorelin), but such combinations lack controlled human safety data.
Sources
  1. [1]Prolonged Stimulation of GH and IGF-I Secretion by CJC-1295, a Long-Acting Analog of GHRH, in Healthy AdultsJ Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2006, PMID 16352683
  2. [2]Phase 2 Study of CJC-1295 in HIV-Infected Patients With HIV-Associated Visceral Obesity (Terminated)ClinicalTrials.gov, ConjuChem, 2005-2006
  3. [3]PubMed search: CJC-1295 growth hormone-releasing hormone analogPubMed (NCBI), search results
Evidence maturity
Anecdote
Mechanism
Animal
Early human
Clinical trials
Approved use

Currently sits at AnimalFindings come mainly from animal models, not people.

Online hypeLowvsActual evidenceEarlyGapBalanced

Jargon, decoded: · · ·

02 · benefits people research this for

Areas this compound is studied or discussed for — not guaranteed effects.

Growth hormone axis
Evidence: Anecdotal / animal-heavy
Status: Research-use-only
Caution: Response, eligibility, and tolerability still vary.
Key facts
  • CJC-1295 “no-DAC” — also called Modified GRF 1-29 (Mod GRF 1-29) — is a synthetic analog of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH): a short-acting copy of the body's own GHRH.
  • It binds GHRH receptors on the pituitary and prompts a discrete pulse of growth hormone, which in turn raises IGF-1 production in the liver.
  • Its half-life is short — roughly 30 minutes — so each injection drives a single GH pulse that clears quickly (a pulsatile signal, not a sustained elevation).
No-DAC vs. with-DAC. The DAC (Drug Affinity Complex) version binds to albumin in the blood and lasts about 6–8 days, producing sustained GH elevation; the no-DAC version is short-acting and pulsatile, mimicking the body's natural rhythm more closely.
Safety & status
  • Not FDA-approved; used only in research-reference contexts.
  • Commonly reported effects include transient flushing or warmth shortly after injection, headache, injection-site irritation, and water retention — typically short-lived.
  • Long-term human safety is not well established.
03 · evidence receipts

Marketing claim vs what the data actually shows. Tap a row for detail.

Claim
Verdict
What the data says
Safely boosts growth hormone
~ Too early
Raises GH release mechanistically, but human safety/benefit data for the popular uses is limited; research-only.
Evidence typeMostly preclinical / animal

What this does not mean: It doesn't mean it's proven in humans — the supporting data is early.

Builds muscle
~ Too early
Muscle-growth claims are not established in controlled human studies.
Evidence typeMostly preclinical / animal

What this does not mean: It doesn't mean it's proven in humans — the supporting data is early.

Verdicts describe the state of the evidence, not invented study results. Open References for the underlying citations.

0 of 2 claims checked
04 · stack fit

Stack fit

Decision clarity: Unknown

Not enough indexed evidence to assess.

Best fitResearch interest in growth-hormone secretagogues and ghrh signalling.
Not a good fit forAnyone expecting proven human outcomes — the human evidence isn't there yet.
Evidence confidenceLow
Risk profileUnclear
Regulatory frictionHigh
Hype riskMedium

Stack verdict: Interesting on paper, but not a clinically proven option. The internet narrative is stronger than the human evidence.

Not proven for

CJC 1295 is not established for:

General anti-aging / longevityHuman injury recoveryMuscle growth or fat loss claimsDisease treatmentAny use as a proven therapy

Tier ranking

F

A weighted evidence score of 33/100 places cjc-1295 in F tier — based on published evidence, not popularity.

Weighted evidence score 33/100

Why not D: held back by human evidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance.

What would move it up: Larger controlled human trials, clearer long-term safety, replicated findings, and regulatory progress.

What would move it down: Failed confirmatory trials, new safety signals, or evidence that popular claims don't translate.

Hype vs evidence (shown separately — does not affect the tier)
Internet hype: LowEvidence strength: EarlyRisk of overstatement: Medium
05 · safety / status
Evidence gap alert. Most support comes from animal, cell, or early research — high-quality human clinical evidence is limited.
Regulatory alert. This compound is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online.
Safety alert. Long-term human safety is not well established. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an additional risk.
Can it legally be used?Research-use-only
EMA / internationalVerify by region
Sport (WADA)Check the current WADA prohibited list
Known side effectsNot well characterized in humans
Biggest unknownsLong-term safety, broad off-label use, rare events
Main cautionResearch-only; human evidence limited; sourcing & purity risk
What we know
  • CJC 1295 is not FDA-approved for human use; it is discussed in a research context.
  • It belongs to the Growth-hormone secretagogues class.
  • Its principal mechanism is characterized in the literature.
What we don't know
  • Whether observed effects reliably translate to humans at large.
  • Long-term safety in healthy users, and full drug-interaction risk.
  • Optimal studied parameters outside any approved indication.
  • Claim-by-claim verdicts — these are authored against verified sources and shown when complete.
  • Quality and purity of material from non-pharmaceutical sources.
Caution if you're researching
Competitive sports (anti-doping)Pregnancy / fertilityCancer-related pathwaysHormonal therapiesResearch-only compoundsDiabetes / glucose regulation

This is not medical advice. These are areas where professional guidance and better evidence matter most.

06 · compare before you decide

See it next to its closest alternatives.

CJC 1295 vs SermorelinCJC 1295 vs Cjc 1295 DacCJC 1295 vs Mod Grf 1 29CJC 1295 vs TesamorelinCJC 1295 vs IpamorelinCJC 1295 vs HexarelinBuild a comparison →
07 · the read

Full brief

A deeper, chapter-by-chapter research briefing. Tap any chapter to expand.

In this brief
  1. What it is
  2. The GHRH signalling mechanism
  3. The preclinical evidence lane
  4. Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower
  5. Proven lane vs speculative lane
  6. What people report
  7. Regulatory status
  8. What changed recently
01What it is

Simple takeaway: CJC 1295 is a research compound in the growth-hormone secretagogues.

Peptides that prompt the pituitary to release growth hormone, via two distinct pathways: GHRH analogs and ghrelin-receptor agonists. It is not approved for human use; it is discussed here in a research context only.

02The GHRH signalling mechanism

Simple takeaway: Stimulating the pituitary's GHRH receptor to release growth hormone.

Growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) analogs activate the pituitary GHRH receptor, prompting pulsatile growth-hormone release. They raise the body's own GH output rather than supplying GH directly.

What this does not prove. A characterized mechanism explains how an effect could occur — it does not prove the effect reliably occurs in humans.
03The preclinical evidence lane

Simple takeaway: Support is mainly preclinical; 0 registered trials and 0 sources indexed.

The most defensible evidence comes from animal and mechanistic models. Human clinical evidence is limited.

What this does not prove. Preclinical or early-stage evidence does not establish reliable human outcomes.
04Why Preliminary, and not higher or lower

Simple takeaway: Composite maturity 2/5.

What holds it back: human evidence, safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance. What supports its placement: mechanism confidence. Stronger human trials, clearer long-term safety data, and regulatory progress would move it up; a safety signal or failure to replicate would move it down.

05Proven lane vs speculative lane

Simple takeaway: The research interest is real; most popular claims remain speculative.

What's supported is the preclinical/mechanistic research. What's speculative is the broad human benefit frequently claimed online, which the indexed human evidence does not establish.

06What people report

Simple takeaway: Community reports are not clinical evidence.

Online reports can surface expectation patterns and possible safety signals, but they are shaped by placebo effects, selection bias, confounders, and uncertain product quality and sourcing. We don't treat anecdotes as proof and we don't publish dosing or protocols.

What this does not prove. Anecdotes cannot establish efficacy or safety.
07Regulatory status

Simple takeaway: Research-use-only

Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts. Regulatory status can change and differs by country; several peptides are also prohibited in sport (WADA). Verify current status before relying on it.

08What changed recently

Simple takeaway: No major evidence-changing update was identified in this review window.

The current profile reflects the existing body of indexed evidence. Material changes — new trials, approvals, or safety findings — are noted here when an editor logs them.

0 of 8 brief sections read
08 · community call

How the community sees this vs the evidence.

Your call on F-tier?

Evidence tier is F. Do you agree?

Community votes reflect user perception, not scientific proof — the evidence tier comes from our Research Maturity Index. Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are collected.

Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are in — we don't show invented numbers.

09 · follow updates
Follow updates on CJC 1295

Get notified when new studies, safety updates, regulatory changes, or the tier ranking change.

· New human study· Safety update· Regulatory change· Tier change· New claim check
10 · FAQ

FAQs

Is CJC 1295 FDA-approved?

No. CJC 1295 is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online. Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts.

What is CJC 1295 studied for?

CJC 1295 is studied mainly for growth hormone. Peptides that prompt the pituitary to release growth hormone, via two distinct pathways: GHRH analogs and ghrelin-receptor agonists.

What does the research say about CJC 1295?

Mostly animal evidence. Human data is limited; most support comes from preclinical research.

Is CJC 1295 safe?

Long-term human safety is not well established for CJC 1295. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an added risk.

🧮 Reconstitution calculator (educational)

Educational reconstitution math from your own values — not medical advice or a dose recommendation. Open the full calculator →

Medication (optional — 30+ in library)
Peptide in vial (mg)
Reconstitution water (mL)
Target amount per draw
Syringe
Draw to
10
units
Volume to draw
0.1
mL
At this amount
20
draws / vial
After one draw
4.75
mg left
Syringe · draw to 10 of 100 units
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100

Each unit on a 100u · 1.0 mL syringe ≈ 25 mcg of this solution.

Concentration
2.5
mg / mL
Concentration
2,500
mcg / mL
Per U-100 unit
25
mcg / unit
Show the math
5 mg × 1000 = 5,000 mcg in the vial
2 mL × 100 = 200 U-100 units of liquid
5,000 mcg ÷ 200 units = 25 mcg per unit
250 mcg ÷ 25 mcg/unit = 10 units
10 units ÷ 100 = 0.1 mL
5,000 mcg ÷ 250 mcg = 20 draws per vial
Compare reconstitution volumes (5mg vial)
Water
mcg / unit
units for 250mcg
1 mL505
2 mL2510
2.5 mL2012.5
3 mL16.6715
5 mL1025

More water → lower concentration → more units for the same amount.

Tweet
📩 Email yourself this setup

Get the vial, water, target, and 10-unit draw sent to your inbox so it's easy to reference — and follow when the evidence changes. Free, no account.

Keep exploring
Compare nextCJC 1295 vs SermorelinSee the evidence side by side.Outcome pathGrowth hormone axisWhere CJC 1295 sits vs. the alternatives.ToolConcentration calculatorHow vial size & water change concentration.
Explore related
Related compounds
SermorelinCCJC 1295 DACFMOD GRF 1 29FTesamorelinAIpamorelinFHexarelinDGhrp 2DGhrp 6D
Class
Growth-hormone secretagogues
Mechanisms
Researched for
Share this fileTweet

← Back to the full database

Research reference only. Not medical advice, treatment instructions, or a purchase recommendation. Consult a licensed professional.

The all-in-one peptide app

Stop reading, start tracking.

PepCue logs your doses, runs the vial math, counts your vials, and keeps the whole protocol in one place. It replaces the spreadsheet, the calculator, and the sticky notes.

  • Dose logging
  • Reconstitution math
  • Smart reminders
  • Vial & cost tracking
iPhone · free to start
CJC 1295: Profile In Progress