VIP.
C💡 Explain this simply
VIP is a research compound.
It draws interest for various research areas.
C-tier evidence: some human evidence exists but isn't definitive.
General anti-aging / longevity; Human injury recovery; Muscle growth or fat loss claims.
Interesting on paper, but not a clinically proven option. The internet narrative is stronger than the human evidence.
VIP is a research compound.
Its biological effect is described in the mechanism section.
It draws interest for various research areas.
C-tier evidence: some human evidence exists but isn't definitive.
An endogenous neuropeptide with pulmonary-vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory properties, investigated for pulmonary arterial hypertension (and as the analogue aviptadil). Evidence is largely preclinical or early-phase; an early study reported improvement with inhaled VIP, but later controlled trials were mixed/modest.
Verified citations resolve to PubMed / FDA. See how we score.
VIP: the research file
What it is
VIP (vasoactive intestinal peptide, also called vasoactive intestinal polypeptide) is a 28-amino-acid neuropeptide first isolated from porcine intestine in the early 1970s. It is highly conserved across mammals and belongs to the secretin/glucagon peptide superfamily, sharing close homology with PACAP (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide). It is widely distributed in the central and peripheral nervous systems and in the gut, and is notably enriched in lung tissue. The synthetic form used in human trials is known as aviptadil.
How it works
VIP signals through two class B G-protein-coupled receptors, VPAC1 and VPAC2, both of which bind VIP and PACAP with high affinity (a related receptor, PAC1, is PACAP-selective). Receptor activation couples primarily to adenylate cyclase, raising intracellular cAMP, with secondary coupling to phospholipase C in some contexts. Downstream effects include smooth-muscle relaxation and vasodilation, bronchodilation, stimulation of exocrine and electrolyte secretion, glucose-dependent insulin secretion (largely via VPAC2), and broad immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory actions that shift cytokine balance away from pro-inflammatory mediators. In the lung, VIP receptors are concentrated on alveolar type II cells, which is part of the rationale for studying it in acute lung injury.
What the evidence shows
Human evidence is mixed and, for most systemic indications, limited. The strongest, most rigorous human data come from TESICO (ACTIV-3b), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous aviptadil in COVID-19-associated hypoxaemic respiratory failure published in Lancet Respiratory Medicine (2023); it enrolled ~471 randomized participants and was stopped for futility, finding no improvement in clinical outcomes versus placebo. The earlier enthusiasm rested largely on small open-label series and preclinical/animal models of acute lung injury and cytokine suppression, which did not translate into proven benefit in the controlled setting. The best-established human use is local, not systemic: aviptadil combined with phentolamine (Invicorp) is an approved intracavernosal injection for erectile dysfunction in several countries. VIP has also held orphan-drug designations for pulmonary hypertension and sarcoidosis, but those indications lack confirmatory pivotal trial evidence.
Safety considerations
As an endogenous vasodilator, systemic VIP/aviptadil can cause hypotension, flushing, and diarrhea, and intravenous infusion has been associated with these effects in trials. Excess endogenous VIP, as seen in VIPoma tumors, produces severe secretory (watery) diarrhea, hypokalemia, and dehydration, illustrating its potent secretory pharmacology. For intracavernosal use, the combination product is reported to carry low rates of penile pain and priapism relative to some other injectables. Long-term safety of systemic administration is not well characterized, and the controlled COVID-19 data did not establish a net clinical benefit; safety beyond the studied settings remains uncertain.
Regulatory status
VIP itself is not an FDA-approved drug; intravenous aviptadil is investigational in the United States and was studied under FDA mechanisms including orphan-drug designations (pulmonary hypertension, sarcoidosis) and emergency COVID-19 trials. The aviptadil/phentolamine combination (Invicorp) is approved for erectile dysfunction in several countries including the UK, Denmark, and New Zealand, but not broadly in the US.
- 28-amino-acid neuropeptide of the secretin/glucagon superfamily, closely related to PACAP
- Acts via class B GPCRs VPAC1 and VPAC2, signaling mainly through cAMP
- Causes vasodilation, bronchodilation, smooth-muscle relaxation, and has anti-inflammatory/immunomodulatory effects
- Enriched in the lung, which motivated trials in acute respiratory failure
- TESICO (2023), the largest controlled trial, found IV aviptadil gave no benefit in COVID-19 respiratory failure and was stopped for futility
- Approved (with phentolamine, as Invicorp) for erectile dysfunction in several countries, but VIP is not an approved systemic therapy
- [1]Pharmacology and functions of receptors for vasoactive intestinal peptide and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide: IUPHAR Review 1 — British Journal of Pharmacology, 2012; PMID 22289055
- [2]Intravenous aviptadil and remdesivir for treatment of COVID-19-associated hypoxaemic respiratory failure in the USA (TESICO): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial — Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2023; PMID 37348524
- [3]Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide/phentolamine for intracavernosal injection in erectile dysfunction (Invicorp) — Drugs, 2008; PMID 18485029
- [4]Therapeutic potential of vasoactive intestinal peptide and its receptor VPAC2 in type 2 diabetes — Frontiers in Endocrinology, 2022; PMC9531956
Currently sits at Early human — Some early human evidence exists but isn't definitive.
Jargon, decoded: · ·
Areas this compound is studied or discussed for — not guaranteed effects.
- VIP (Vasoactive Intestinal Peptide) is an endogenous neuropeptide with vasodilatory and anti-inflammatory/immune-modulating effects.
- Intranasal VIP and the analog aviptadil have been studied in specific investigational contexts (e.g. respiratory/inflammatory conditions).
- Not FDA-approved for most discussed uses; investigational.
- Can cause flushing/blood-pressure effects; medical context matters.
Marketing claim vs what the data actually shows. Tap a row for detail.
Claim audit for VIP is in progress — common claims will be checked against sources here. Meanwhile, the real source corpus is in References.
Stack fit
Decision clarity: MediumPromising evidence, but with gaps in human data, safety, or approval.
Stack verdict: Interesting on paper, but not a clinically proven option. The internet narrative is stronger than the human evidence.
VIP is not established for:
Tier ranking
A weighted evidence score of 50/100 places vip in C tier — based on published evidence, not popularity.
Weighted evidence score 50/100
Why not B: held back by safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance.
Why not D: supported by mechanism confidence.
What would move it up: Larger controlled human trials, clearer long-term safety, replicated findings, and regulatory progress.
What would move it down: Failed confirmatory trials, new safety signals, or evidence that popular claims don't translate.
- VIP is not FDA-approved for human use; it is discussed in a research context.
- Whether observed effects reliably translate to humans at large.
- Long-term safety in healthy users, and full drug-interaction risk.
- Optimal studied parameters outside any approved indication.
- Claim-by-claim verdicts — these are authored against verified sources and shown when complete.
- Quality and purity of material from non-pharmaceutical sources.
This is not medical advice. These are areas where professional guidance and better evidence matter most.
See it next to its closest alternatives.
Compare VIP against any other compound →
Full brief
A deeper, chapter-by-chapter research briefing. Tap any chapter to expand.
- What it is
- The preclinical evidence lane
- Why Early, and not higher or lower
- Proven lane vs speculative lane
- What people report
- Regulatory status
- What changed recently
01What it is
Simple takeaway: VIP is a research compound.
It is not approved for human use; it is discussed here in a research context only.
03The preclinical evidence lane
Simple takeaway: Support is mainly preclinical; 0 registered trials and 0 sources indexed.
The most defensible evidence comes from animal and mechanistic models. Human clinical evidence is present but limited.
04Why Early, and not higher or lower
Simple takeaway: Composite maturity 2.7/5.
What holds it back: safety clarity, regulatory clarity, practical relevance. What supports its placement: mechanism confidence. Stronger human trials, clearer long-term safety data, and regulatory progress would move it up; a safety signal or failure to replicate would move it down.
05Proven lane vs speculative lane
Simple takeaway: The research interest is real; most popular claims remain speculative.
What's supported is the preclinical/mechanistic research. What's speculative is the broad human benefit frequently claimed online, which the indexed human evidence does not establish.
06What people report
Simple takeaway: Community reports are not clinical evidence.
Online reports can surface expectation patterns and possible safety signals, but they are shaped by placebo effects, selection bias, confounders, and uncertain product quality and sourcing. We don't treat anecdotes as proof and we don't publish dosing or protocols.
07Regulatory status
Simple takeaway: Research-use-only
Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts. Regulatory status can change and differs by country; several peptides are also prohibited in sport (WADA). Verify current status before relying on it.
08What changed recently
Simple takeaway: No major evidence-changing update was identified in this review window.
The current profile reflects the existing body of indexed evidence. Material changes — new trials, approvals, or safety findings — are noted here when an editor logs them.
How the community sees this vs the evidence.
Evidence tier is C. Do you agree?
Community votes reflect user perception, not scientific proof — the evidence tier comes from our Research Maturity Index. Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are collected.
Aggregate community sentiment will appear here once enough votes are in — we don't show invented numbers.
Get notified when new studies, safety updates, regulatory changes, or the tier ranking change.
FAQs
Is VIP FDA-approved?
No. VIP is not FDA-approved for the uses commonly discussed online. Not approved by the FDA for human use; studied in research contexts.
What is VIP studied for?
VIP is studied mainly for immune.
What does the research say about VIP?
Promising but early. Some human evidence exists, but it isn't yet definitive and gaps remain.
Is VIP safe?
Long-term human safety is not well established for VIP. Quality and purity from non-pharmaceutical sources is an added risk.
🧮 Reconstitution calculator (educational)
Educational reconstitution math from your own values — not medical advice or a dose recommendation. Open the full calculator →
Each unit on a 100u · 1.0 mL syringe ≈ 25 mcg of this solution.
Show the math
More water → lower concentration → more units for the same amount.
Get the vial, water, target, and 10-unit draw sent to your inbox so it's easy to reference — and follow when the evidence changes. Free, no account.
Research reference only. Not medical advice, treatment instructions, or a purchase recommendation. Consult a licensed professional.